Journal Home
Search for

Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 426-433 (December 2004)


View previous. 7 of 13 View next.

Auditing morbidity and mortality in gynaecological surgery

John ButleraCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Thomas Indbc

Summary 

Recent high profile failures in recognising sub-optimal surgery have highlighted the importance of quality assurance in operative care. Structure (e.g. suitable equipment), process (e.g. pre-operative protocol adherence), and outcome (e.g. quality of life) are all important variables to audit. Raw data on outcomes does not take into account case mix and therefore data collection and comparisons of surgical mortality and morbidity are not straightforward. The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) is a method which scores 12 physiological and six operative variables in order to predict surgical morbidity and mortality. Patients are stratified according to risk, and this allows comparative audit between surgeons, units and procedures. If research validates POSSUM for gynaecological surgery, it will provide an accurate assessment of performance, by comparing observed to expected morbidity and mortality in a ‘Variable Life Adjusted Display’ (VLAD). Early recognition and action on poor performance will help maintain and promote quality in gynaecological surgery.

a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hillingdon Hospital, Pield Heath Road, Uxbridge UB8 3NN, UK

b Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK

c Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. George's Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 OQT, UK

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44-7968-054-786.

PII: S0957-5847(04)00098-8

doi:10.1016/j.curobgyn.2004.07.007


View previous. 7 of 13 View next.